Ap Human Geo-Rate of Natural Increase free essay sample

When a country has rapid growth such as Uganda it means that it’s a developing country. A country such as Germany is a developed country because it has a negative rate of natural increase. The rate of natural increase is the crude birth rate minus the crude death rate of a population. The rate of natural increase for Uganda is 3%. The doubling time for Uganda is 23 years. The doubling time for Germany is that ere is no doubling time. This is because Germany’s rate of natural increase is -0. 2%. Uganda’s GDP is $1,390, GDP is the average salary for one person, in one year. Germany’s GDP is $27,820. Uganda’s health care spending is $57 per person. The health care spending that one person would spend in Germany is $2,820. The female education in Uganda is 13% that are enrolled in secondary schools, in 2004. Females that are enrolled in secondary schools in 2004, in Germany is 88%. We will write a custom essay sample on Ap Human Geo-Rate of Natural Increase or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page In conclusion Uganda is a developing country and it’s living standard are poor. Meaning that health care isn’t there medical care in Uganda, so they can’t spend the money on it, and even if it was there, most people in Uganda would not be able to afford it since the GDP is only $1,390 per person, per year.Overall Uganda has women with little education, because they stay at home, taking care of the children. Germany is a developed country, with a pretty high standard of life. Intern meaning that health care is in Germany, and most people do spend money on it. Overall Germany has women with an education, meaning more people have money to spend on things. As a whole Germany and Uganda are very different counties, and have very different living standards.

Comparing Old New Terrorism The WritePass Journal

Comparing Old New Terrorism Introduction Comparing Old New Terrorism Introduction1.1 Background1.2 Aims and Objectives  1.3 Research Questions1.4 Scope of the Study1.5 Structure of the Study2 Literature Review2.1 Defining Terrorism and emerging forms of Terrorism2.2 Factors that contributed to Terrorism’s Success2.3 Current prevention and enforcement options2.4Trends3. Methodology 3.1 Introduction3.2 Methods of Data Collection3.2.1 Case Study AnalysisCase Study4.1 Irish Republican Army formation factors4.2 Effectiveness of the IRA methods4.3 Al Qaeda formation factors4.4 Effectiveness of the IRA methods4.5 Trends4.8 Discussion5. Conclusion  7. ReferencesRelated Introduction 1.1 Background In the countdown to the end of the twentieth century, notable scholars came up with a new concept of New Terrorism which represents a shift from the traditional terrorism. The new terrorism refers to a qualitative change in the nature of terrorism, which has allegedly taken place during the 1990s (Kurtulus 2007:476). This paradigm has also been variously referred to as contemporary terrorism (Laqueur 2003) post-modern terrorism, super-terrorism, catastrophic terrorism and hyper-terrorism (Field 2009). This dissertation intends to undertake the examination of this paradigm shift. It intends to examine the various sources if there is indeed a New Terrorism as canvassed by some scholars and policy makers. It would do this by doing a case study of Irish Republican Army, or the IRA and Al Qaeda representing each group. 1.2 Aims and Objectives In this section, the research aims, objectives, and research questions will be outlined.   Firstly, the aim of this research is as follows: To ensure that this aim is fully explored, the following research objectives have been devised: How are the emerging forms of terrorism different from the traditional methods? How should the existing counterterrorism infrastructure be amended in order to meet the challenges of the modern age?   1.3 Research Questions The research question is as follows: What are the new forms of terrorism and what factors created them? What are the key factors that have contributed to the success of these new terrorist practices? Is the current counterterrorist system capable of dealing with the emerging terrorist threat? To seek to explore this aim, research question and these objectives, a review of the literature will be undertaken to explore these areas have experienced change over time.   The findings from this review will be used to explore and examine the research aim, objectives and question.   To ensure that this is appropriately undertaken the following topics will be discussed in the review: 1.4 Scope of the Study A study of the Irish Republican Army will be undertaken in comparison to the modern operations of the recognized terrorist agency Al Qaeda. 1.5 Structure of the Study This study will be comprised of 6 sections including the introduction, literature review, and methodology, case study analysis, Discussion, Conclusion. 2 Literature Review   The section will review relevant literature as regards the proposed research. 2.1 Defining Terrorism and emerging forms of Terrorism 2.2 Factors that contributed to Terrorism’s Success 2.3 Current prevention and enforcement options 2.4Trends 3. Methodology This chapter illustrates the research methodology used as well as providing a brief introductory passage regarding the meaning of research methodology.   3.1 Introduction The methodology focuses on an explanation of the qualitative and quantitative research approaches considered for this thesis to answer the following questions: How are the emerging forms of terrorism different from the traditional methods? How should the existing counterterrorism infrastructure be amended in order to meet the challenges of the modern age? This includes the elements of the research approach adopted and the reasons behind this choice. 3.2 Methods of Data Collection Secondary sources dating from the operation of the Irish Republican Army as well as year to date operations of Al Qaeda will provide the required range of data for assessment. 3.2.1 Case Study Analysis Yin (2009) contends that the case study analysis strategy is a valid tool for providing empirical content.   This method of research allows for an investigation into the real world impact of terrorism. Others contend that the case study is not always the best strategic analysis approach (Baxter and Jack 2008).   However, Stake (1995) demonstrates that a case study can provide understanding and increase the capacity for understanding. The approach for this dissertation will utilize a qualitative, interpretative research method; a case study examination of the Irish Republican Army and Al Qaeda. Yin (2009) demonstrates that the exploratory case study method can be used to examine situations in which there is no defined outcome. This research will rest on the goal to identify challenges and lessons for future. For the purposes of this research, the qualitative research approach is more suitable due to capacity to assess the wide ranging nature the terrorist conditions. Case Study This section will present a case study examination of the Irish Republican Army in comparison to the operations of Al Qaeda. 4.1 Irish Republican Army formation factors Ryanair and (another airline of your choice) 4.2 Effectiveness of the IRA methods 4.3 Al Qaeda formation factors 4.4 Effectiveness of the IRA methods 4.5 Trends 4.8 Discussion (Tie the case study to the literature review) 5. Conclusion   7. References Baxter, P. and Jack, S. 2008. Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers.  The Qualitative Report, 13 (4), pp. 544559. Field, A. 2009. The ‘New Terrorism’: Revolution or Evolution?.  Political Studies Review, 7 (2), pp. 195207. Kurtulus, E. 2011. The â€Å"new terrorism† and its critics.  Studies in Conflict \ Terrorism, 34 (6), pp. 476500. Laqueur, W. 2003.  No end to war. New York: Continuum. Stake, R. 1995. The art of case study research.  Sage Publications, Inc. Yin, R. 2009.  Case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Why are similar independence claims the subject of different responses Essay

Why are similar independence claims the subject of different responses from the international community The international communitys position on Kosovo, South Ossetia and Abkhazia - Essay Example vestigation of the issues and facts that divide the international community in its responses to the secessions of Kosovo, Abkhazia and South Ossetia reveal that the legality of these secessions are not the only determining factors. A review of the literature seems to suggest that power politics has a role to play in the responses to these secessions. In other words, there is an emerging trend indicating that it is possible to conclude that world powers are more inclined to support or refuse to support an entity’s secession based on political rather than legal reasoning. The purpose of this research is to demonstrate that power politics permits what amounts to a spin on the international legal framework for statehood and state recognition. The secessions of South Ossetia, Abkhazia and Kosovo will be compared and contrasted with a view to determining the way that the international community should have responded to these secessions and how they in fact, responded. It will be argued that from a purely legal perspective the secessions are no different from one another, and power politics plays a greater role in the international community’s responses than international customary law. The 2008 declarations of independence by South Ossetia, Abkhazia and Kosovo was met by entirely different responses by the international community, specifically international organizations such as the United Nations (UN), the Council of Europe (CoE) and the Organizations for Security Cooperation with Europe (OSCE) .2 The CoE, the UN and the OSCE readily recognized Kosovo’s independence but at the same time did not accept and recognize the secession of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.3 The European Union (EU) which occupies a unique position in its relationship with Russia, was split on Kosovo’s independence and unquestionably unsupportive of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.4 NATO and the United States (US) accepted and recognized Kosovo’s independence but outright refused to accept